KOL rankings

KOL rankings & evaluation

This is not a "who tweets best" leaderboard. It's a research entry map organized by "whose methods are worth learning." Judged by actionability, authenticity, strategic effectiveness, and risk fit—not entertainment value.

Update frequency
Bi-weekly
Coverage
11 KOLs
Primary use
Research / Filtering
Core question
Who's worth deep study

📚 Current rankings & archives

Full rankings and detailed analysis remain in Chinese. These are the primary source documents.

📊 KOL Comprehensive Evaluation & Recommendation Ranking

2026-03-08

First comprehensive evaluation of 11 Polymarket KOLs, establishing overall ranking, methodology, and recommendation order.

Overall ranking11 KOLsComposite score

📱 KOL Bi-weekly Tweet Summary (2/22–3/8)

2026-03-08

Scanned 5 high-signal KOLs' tweets from the past 2 weeks, extracting key insights, strategic moves, and actionability.

Bi-weekly summaryTweet analysisHigh-frequency updates

📱 @runes_leo Bi-weekly Special Summary

2026-03-08

15 tweets deep analysis, focusing on Claude Code workflow, AI Chief of Staff, and Pre-Market validation.

Special summaryAI workflowCase study
Judgment criteria: Rankings serve "research priority," not entertainment. Prioritize learning from KOLs with clear frameworks, reproducibility, verifiability, and well-defined risk.

📈 Evaluation methodology

  • Importance (25%): Method influence and uniqueness
  • Actionability (25%): Can ordinary people understand and replicate
  • Information authenticity (20%): Are data and conclusions verifiable
  • Strategic effectiveness (15%): Long-term method value vs single-event results
  • Learning curve (10%): Onboarding cost and learning threshold
  • Risk level (5%): Whether the cost of method failure is controllable

🔗 Continue reading

Back to

KOL research directory
Sample profile

@vladic_eth detailed analysis (ZH)