Weekly Report · 2026-03-10

Prediction Market Weekly Report

This week’s highlights: a Polymarket market-making bot deep dive, a copytrading execution framework, trader behavior data, and decision-making models. From a $67K bot base to over $1.13M in cumulative profits, and from $150 to $32.7K in copytrading practice.

Coverage
2026-03-03 ~ 03-10
Sources
5 selected KOLs
Themes
Market Making / Copytrading / Decision Models
Read time
~8 min

🔬 Deep Dive: Polymarket Market-Making Bot

@runes_leo

A market-making bot deployed with roughly $67K in capital executed 3,379 trades and accumulated over $1.13M in profit. This is not directional betting. It is continuous order-book maintenance at professional scale.

Key findings

  • 100% BUY flow: a two-sided market-making style, buying both UP and DOWN to monetize spread
  • 34 trades per minute: at peak, it maintained around 100 positions across BTC / ETH / SOL / XRP
  • ETH 1h was the main engine: 737 trades, contributing the largest single-asset volume
  • Open priority matters: 11.6% of trades concentrated in the first 0–10% of market life, where queue position matters most

Profit and risk

  • 4h timeframes showed the highest profit rate, though they were a small share of total trades
  • BTC was the danger zone: a single 1h candle could lose around $2,000 when position size got too large
  • Market making has a kind of “self-healing” behavior as long as spread structure is not permanently broken

Main insight

The core edge of a market maker is not better prediction. It is better queue position. High frequency is infrastructure, not the strategy itself. Adding directional overlays can improve ROI, but also magnifies directional mistakes.

📊 Practical Guide: Copytrading from $150 to $32.7K

@DextersSolab

Copytrading is not passive income. It is active capital allocation. The key is to think like a portfolio manager, not like a blind follower.

Four wallet-selection filters

  • Consistency beats short-term spikes: look for stable records over 2–3 months
  • Trade frequency of 30–200 per month: too few may be luck, too many may be bots
  • Specialization: focus on wallets with 1–3 clear domains, not random everything-traders
  • Drawdown control: max drawdown under 25% is a useful safety line

Five traps to avoid

  • Bot wallets with impossible-looking win rates that your slippage will destroy
  • One-off insider-looking wins with no repeatable edge
  • Very short track records
  • Low-liquidity traders where your copy size becomes their exit liquidity
  • Highly correlated wallet baskets all betting the same narrative

Example: CS:GO specialist

Wallet 0x25e...9a09 showed a 90% win rate, focused on CS:GO and LoL, and moved from roughly $245 to $89,000 in 30 days. The real lesson is not luck; it is early discovery plus validated specialization.

📈 Data Insight: What 112K Wallets Reveal

@odailychina

A six-month analysis of 112,000 Polymarket wallets suggests that 87.3% of users ultimately lose money. The top 1% behave differently in a few repeatable ways.

Five profitable patterns

  • Fade extremes: sell YES when contracts are pushed to euphoric levels, buy near panic pricing
  • Quarter-Kelly-like sizing: actual allocation was far smaller than full-Kelly suggestions
  • Extreme specialization: wallets focused on 1–2 categories performed far better than generalized traders
  • Trade price movement, not just final resolution: many strong traders held for 18–72 hours, then exited once new information was priced in
  • Avoid the first wave after breaking news: wait for emotional flow and larger dislocations

Main conclusion

Top traders do not win because they have impossible hit rates. Their win rates often sit in the 55%–67% range. The difference comes from odds, sizing, and specialization. Trade quality matters more than trade count.

🧠 Decision Models: The Hidden Math Behind Better Choices

@zodchiii

Six models that improve both trading and judgment: expected value, base rates, sunk cost, Bayesian updating, survivorship bias, and Kelly sizing.

Core takeaways

  • EV = Σ(probability × payoff): calculate expected value before trusting intuition
  • Base rates matter: do not ignore the denominator when interpreting new evidence
  • Sunk cost is not a reason to continue: prior spending does not justify fresh risk
  • Bayesian updating: adjust probabilities gradually as evidence changes
  • Survivorship bias: always ask where the denominator is

Decision checklist

Before entering a trade or making a major call, ask: Have I calculated EV? What is the base rate? Am I reacting to sunk cost? How should new evidence update my probability? What does the denominator look like? How large should this position really be?

📋 This Week’s Action List

  • If you are market making: review queue priority and instrument selection; ETH/SOL may behave very differently from BTC
  • If you are copytrading: review your wallet basket, correlation exposure, and lag assumptions
  • If you are trading directionally: measure your actual win rate, concentration, and holding pattern
  • If you are improving judgment: use EV and base rates before making the next major decision