KOL rankings

KOL ranking & evaluation

This is not a leaderboard of who is loudest. It is a research index for deciding whose methods are worth studying, testing, and adapting.

Cadence
Biweekly
Coverage
11 KOLs
Use case
Research / filtering
Core question
Who is worth deep study?

📚 Current rankings & archive

📊 Full KOL ranking & recommendation order

2026-03-08

First comprehensive ranking of 11 Polymarket KOLs with a multi-factor scoring framework.

Master ranking11 KOLsScoring

📱 Biweekly KOL tweet summary (2/22–3/8)

2026-03-08

Recent high-signal tweets, strategy fragments, and recurring ideas worth extracting.

BiweeklyTweet analysisSignal flow

📱 @runes_leo biweekly focus

2026-03-08

Focused analysis on Claude Code workflows, AI chief-of-staff concepts, and pre-market validation.

Special focusAI workflowCase study
Design principle: ranking should guide study order, not attention farming. Prefer KOLs with clearer frameworks, stronger verifiability, and better reuse value.

📈 Evaluation method

  • Importance (25%) — originality and impact of the method
  • Operability (25%) — whether normal users can actually apply it
  • Truthfulness (20%) — reliability and verifiability of claims
  • Strategy value (15%) — repeatable usefulness beyond one-off trades
  • Learning curve (10%) — cost to understand and deploy
  • Risk profile (5%) — how dangerous failure modes are

🔗 Continue reading

Back to

KOL research directory
Model page

@vladic_eth detailed analysis